Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
effects_of_family_structure_on_child_abuse [2015/07/31 12:52]
marri created
effects_of_family_structure_on_child_abuse [2017/05/23 07:11] (current)
marri
Line 1: Line 1:
 ==========Effects of Family Structure on Child Abuse========== ==========Effects of Family Structure on Child Abuse==========
  
-//Synthesis Paper//: [[http://​thf_media.s3.amazonaws.com/​1997/​pdf/​bg1115.pdf|The Child Abuse Crisis: The Disintegration of Marriage, Family, and the American Community]] +Today, more Americans live in a manner that separates the bearing and raising of children from traditional marriage. This undermines the well-being of children. ​Since 1950, the Index of Belonging ​for U.S. teenagers—the number ​of teens raised ​in an intact married familyhas decreased from 63 percent to 46 percent.((Patrick F. Fagan and Christina Hadford, “The Fifth Annual Index of Family Belonging and Rejection,​” Marriage and Religion Research Institute (2015)Available at [[http://​marri.us/​research/​research-papers/​fifth-annual-index-of-belonging-and-rejection/​]])) ​The United States increasingly is becoming a country of second-, third-, and even fourth-generation marriage-less "​families."​ In such circumstances,​ as the research shows, children are most likely to suffer abuse and neglect, and new subcultures of [[child_abuse_in_the_united_states|abuse]] are more likely to be established.
- +
-Today, more Americans live in a manner that separates the bearing and raising of children from traditional marriage. This undermines the well-being of children. ​In 1950, for every 100 children born in the United States, 12 entered broken families, either by being born out of wedlock or through their parents'​ obtaining a divorce that year. In 1992, for every 100 children born in the United States60 entered broken families. The picture is even worse if all the children who are aborted each year are taken into consideration. The United States increasingly is becoming a country of second-, third-, and even fourth-generation marriage-less "​families."​ In such circumstances,​ as the research shows, children are most likely to suffer abuse and neglect, and new subcultures of abuse are more likely to be established.+
  
 =====1. The Intact Married Family===== =====1. The Intact Married Family=====
  
-Child abuse is the opposite of child love. The married family is based deliberately on a decision by the husband and wife to build their lives and family on the love they have for each other, made public in a solemn contract before God and community. ​That such a decision would have a significant impact on the incidence of child abuse is common sense. That abuse is higher when the structure of family love is rejected or broken ​likewise makes sense. Measuring the differential impact of these family structures in the national surveys (intended to guide the country and its leaders on public policy) is therefore essential, and will have grave implications for the life and death of many children in the United States.+Child abuse is the opposite of child love. The married family is based deliberately on a decision by the husband and wife to build their lives and family on the love they have for each other, made public in a solemn contract before God and community. ​Abuse is higher when the structure of family love is rejected or broken. Measuring the differential impact of these family structures in the national surveys (intended to guide the country and its leaders on public policy) is therefore essential, and will have grave implications for the life and death of many [[child_abuse_in_the_united_states|children in the United States]].
  
-Although the sexual act can be an occasion of great intimacy and love resulting in new life, it also can be a violent or meaningless act resulting in profound alienation and fragmentation of the family. Among America'​s poor, the latter is increasingly the case: 72 percent of children ​whose families have incomes below $15,000 are living in broken ​families. ​ These poorest of the poor, more than anyone else, need the support of an intimate community and can least afford the community'​s destruction. The children of the poor have the greatest need for married families, yet they are the least likely to have them.+Although the sexual act can be an occasion of great intimacy and love resulting in new life, it also can be a violent or meaningless act resulting in profound alienation and fragmentation of the family. Among America'​s poor, the latter is increasingly the case. In 2013, 70.5 percent of children living ​below poverty were raised ​in [[effects_of_single_parents_on_poverty_rates|non-intact ​families]].((//​American Community Survey//, U.S. Census Bureau (2013).)) These poorest of the poor, more than anyone else, need the support of an intimate community and can least afford the [[effects_of_community_environment_on_juvenile_crime_rates|community'​s destruction]]. The children of the poor have the [[effects_of_marriage_on_child_poverty|greatest need for married families]], yet they are the least likely to have them.
  
-Traditionally,​ the variable used to explain a rise in the incidence of child abuse has been poverty. The most recent ​National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect illustrates this pro-poverty bias.  However, Richard Gelles of the University of Rhode Island Department of Sociology, a recognized expert on abuse, has shown that it is the presence or absence of adult support that makes the greatest difference in determining whether child abuse is likely to be present or absent within poor families. ​+Traditionally,​ the variable used to explain a rise in the incidence of child abuse has been poverty. The National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect illustrates this pro-poverty bias.((U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect //The Third National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect// Andrea J. Sedlak, Ph.D., and Diane D. Broadhurst, M.L.A., (NIS-3): Final Report, (Washington,​ D.C., September 1996), 55.)) However, Richard Gelles of the University of Rhode Island Department of Sociology, a recognized expert on abuse, has shown that it is the presence or absence of adult support that makes the greatest difference in determining whether ​[[demographics_of_child_abuse|child abuse is likely to be present]] or absent within poor families.((Richard Gelles, "​Poverty and Violence Toward Children,"​ //American Behavioral Scientist// 35, no. 3 (1992): 258-274, and "Child Abuse and Violence in Single Parent Families,"​ //American Journal of Orthopsychiatry//​ 59 (1989): 492-501.))
  
-There is strong evidence from the British research ​that the structure of the family is related directly to the safety ​of mothers and children. The most dangerous place for a woman and her child is an environment in which she is cohabiting with a boyfriend who is not the father ​of her children. The rate of child abuse may be as much as 33 times higher. Even cohabiting with the children'​s father may lead to a rate of abuse as much as 20 times higher. Marriage provides ​the safest environment for children. It therefore truly makes difference in advancing the safety and well-being of America'​s children.+The Fourth Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect has also confirmed that marriage provides ​the [[link_between_family_structure_and_child_abuse|safest environment for children]]. This federal survey shows that the family ​environment with the lowest risk ratio for physical abuse is the intact married family: 
 +  * **The rate of physical abuse is 3 times higher** in the single parent family. 
 +  * **The rate of physical abuse is 4 times higher** if mother ​is cohabiting with the child’s biological ​father ​(unmarried). 
 +  * **The rate of physical ​abuse is 5 times higher** if the child is living in married step family. 
 +  * **The rate of physical ​abuse is 10 times higher** if the mother is cohabiting with boyfriend.
  
-=====2. The Non-Intact Family=====+{{ :​relative_rates_of_physical_abuse.png?​direct&​500 |Relative Rates of Physical Abuse}}
  
-According to the professional literature, an abusing family tends not to be the traditional American ​family--that ​is, one in which the biological parents are married and raising their own children togetherMembers of an abusing family often fight over infidelity, and the primary parent frequently will change partners, causing stressful rearrangements of major family responsibilities and conflicts over the childrenOther characteristics ​of these families include poor communication skills, inappropriate expectations of their children, and frequent alcohol and drug abuse. ​Occasionally ​the patterns of abuse documented ​in the professional literature are revealed dramatically in actual occurrencesA 1996 article in The Washington Post illustrates how cohabitation can relate to child abuse and the death of child:+For sexual abuse the rates are even higher. Compared ​to the always intact married ​family
 +  * **The rate of sexual abuse is 5 times higher** ​in the single parent family and when both biological parents are cohabiting (i.eunmarried). 
 +  * **The rate of sexual ​abuse is 8.6 times higher** if the child is living ​in a married step family. 
 +  * **The rate of sexual ​abuse is 20 times higher** if the mother is cohabiting with boyfriend.
  
-> On the night Bridgette was killed it was the child'​s "​sighing"​ that upset her father'​s girlfriend, then 20 and a student [who] was studying for an examAfter failed attempts to quiet the child, Davis watched as Meridin, who is not the child'​s mother, pushed Bridgette'​s forehead with her finger, picked the child up by her head and flung her toward him. Then he and Meridin stuffed a pair of socks into Bridgette'​s mouth, placed a hooded sweat shirt backward around the child'​s head and secured it with duct tape. Bridgette then was placed in a closet and partially covered with clothes. Meanwhile, Davis and Meridin sat down to eat dinner. ​+{{ :​relative_rates_of_sexual_abuse.png?​direct&​500 |Relative Rates of Sexual Abuse}}
  
-Growing up is much more dangerous with cohabiting couplesSo are fights about infidelity and jealousya characteristic that may well be key in identifying ​the abusing family. ​ Less able to talk through differences ​and difficulties ​and come to agreement cohabiting ​couples frequently use force and aggression "​Normal"​ and stable families, on the other hand, typically exhibit a high level of agreement between parents and strong affection between parents and childrenboth of which result ​in much greater levels of agreement between adolescents ​and their parentsIn additionthere is evidence that stable families participate at a higher rate in religious worship Abuse can be tied to poverty, community, and marital status, even though not all poor, single, inner-city parents become abusers.+=====2. The Non-Intact Family===== 
 + 
 +According to the professional literaturean abusing family tends not to be the traditional American family--that is, one in which the biological parents are married and raising their own children together. Members of an abusing family ​often fight over infidelity, and the primary parent frequently will change partners, causing stressful rearrangements of major family responsibilities and conflicts over the childrenOther characteristics of these families include poor communication skills, inappropriate expectations of their children, ​and frequent alcohol ​and drug abuse.  
 + 
 +Children with cohabiting parents are twice as likely ​to see their parents break up compared to children with married parents.((Wendy ManningPamela Smock, and Debarun Majumdar, "The Relative Stability of Cohabiting and Marital Unions for Children,"​ //​Population Research and Policy Review// 23, no. 2 (2004): 135-159.)) This type of instability often leads to behavioral problems. One study found that 15.7 percent of children from cohabiting ​households experienced behavioral problems in adolescence,​ compared with only 3.5 percent of children with married parents.((Gregory Acs and Sandi Nelson, “The Kids are Alright? Children’s Well-Being and the Rise in Cohabitation,​” //Urban Institute// (2002).)) "​Normal"​ and stable families typically exhibit a more healthy environmentas fewer teenage girls in married households initiate sex at a younger age or get [[effects_of_family_structure_on_teen_pregnancies|pregnant as teens]].((Ronald E. Bulanda, ​and Wendy DManning"​Parental Cohabitation Experiences and Adolescent Behavioral Outcomes,"​ //​Population Research and Policy Review// 27, no. 5 (2008).)) Abuse can be tied to [[link_between_family_structure_and_child_abuse|poverty]][[effect_of_community_environment_on_child_abuse|community]], and [[demographics_of_child_abuse|marital status]], even though not all poor, single, inner-city parents become abusers.
  
 ====2.1 Abusive Men==== ====2.1 Abusive Men====
  
-According to the studies, ​a boy severely abused by his father is very likely to become a violent adult. ​ Men who have witnessed ​their parents, or a parent ​and cohabiting non-parent, physically attack each other are three times as likely to hit their own wives or cohabiting females Moreover, the effects of these early experiences with abuse and violence begin to show up at the beginning of their relationships with women in later years. ​Many of the background characteristics of wife-batterers ​exist in college ​men who engage ​in low-level courtship violence Growing concerns about date rape should lead investigators to explore the early family histories of abusing males in more detail.+The intergenerational continuation theory of child abuse also affirms that a boy severely abused by his father is very likely to [[effects_of_abuse_on_children|become a violent adult]].((P. Alexander, S. Moore, and E. Alexander, "What Is Transmitted in the Intergenerational Transmission of Violence?"​ //Journal of Marriage and the Family// no. 53 (1991): 657-667. \\ Ricky Finzi-Dottan,​ and Galit Harel, "​Parents’ Potential for Child Abuse: An Intergenerational Perspective,"​ //Journal of Family Violence// 29, no. 4 (2014): 397-408.)) Specifically,​ one-third of sexually abusive men were sexually abused as a child.((Delphine Collin-Vézina,​ and Mireille Cyr, "​Current Understanding about Intergenerational Transmission of Child Sexual Abuse,"​ //Child Abuse & Neglect// 27, no. 5 (2003).)) ​Men who had witnessed ​conjugal violence ​and had experienced ​parent-child aggression ​as boys are more likely to use physical and verbal aggression in their relationships.((Nancy J. Shook, Deborah A. Gerrity, Joan Jurich, and Allen E. Segrist, “Courtship Violence Among College Students: A Comparison of Verbally and Physically Abusive Couples,” //Journal of Family Violence// 15, no. 1 (2000): 1-22)) ​Moreover, the effects of these early experiences with abuse and violence begin to show up at the beginning of their relationships with women in later years. ​One study found that wife batterers ​received significantly less love, more punishment from their mothers, and less attention from their fathers, than did men in a general population.((Clayton Neighbors, Denise D. Walker, Roger A. Roffman, Lyungai F. Mbilinyi, and Jeffrey L. Edleson, “Self-determination Theory and Motivational Interviewing:​ Complementary Models to Elicit Voluntary Engagement by Partner-Abusive Men,” //The American Journal of Family Therapy// 36, no2 (2003): 126)) Growing concerns about date rape should lead investigators to explore the early family histories of abusing males in more detail.
  
-For abusing men, violence frequently is a way to regain what they see as their lost control of a relationship. ​ Conflict over children is likely to provoke this sense of a loss of control, and even to lead a couple to blows. ​+For abusing men, violence frequently is a way to regain what they see as their lost control of a relationship.((Linda N. Bly, "​Self-Help & Child Abuse: Victims, Victimizers & the Development of Self-Control,"​ //​Contemporary Family Therapy// 10, no. 4 (1988): 243-255.)) ​Conflict over children is likely to provoke this sense of a loss of control, and even to lead a couple to blows.((B. Carlson, "​Causes and Maintenance of Domestic Violence: An Ecological Analysis,"​ //Social Service Review// 58, no. 4 (1984): 569-587.)) Additionally,​ abusing men tend to have more health concerns (including depression, paranoid ideation and more), feel more stress about parenting, and feel less empathy for their children.((Karen J. Francis, and David A. Wolfe, “Cognitive and Emotional Differences Between Abusive and Non-abusive Fathers,” //Child Abuse & Neglect// 32, no. 12, (2008).))
  
-=====2.2 Abusive Women==== ​+====2.2 Abusive Women====
  
-Contrary to public perception, research shows that the most likely physical abuser of a young child will be that child'​s mother, not a male in the household, although the mother'​s plight often is complicated by her relationship with a cohabiting male. Abusive mothers frequently are isolatedand lack the parental and extended family or peer support that is necessary to maintain their self-esteem and to buffer the stress of raising children. ​ Without this support, they often seek care and comfort from their children, treating these children as if they were older than they really are. When children fail to provide this support, the mother can become impatient, angry, and sometimes abusive, even when the child is only a crying infant. Others find any social stimulation from their babies (whether smiling or crying) to be much more irritating than normal mothers do.  Their abuse in turn adds to their anxiety and feelings of helplessness. ​ If the woman is a second-generation or later generation out-of-wedlock mother, or if she is a teenager, she is less likely to know what the appropriate expectations of a young child should be.+Contrary to public perception, research shows that the most likely physical abuser of a young child will be that child'​s mother, not a male in the household, although the mother'​s plight often is complicated by her relationship with a cohabiting male. Abusive mothers frequently are isolated and lack the parental and extended family or peer support that is necessary to maintain their self-esteem and to buffer the stress of raising children.((Joel S. Milner, Kevin R. Robertson, and Debbie L. Rogers, "​Childhood History of Abuse and Adult Child Abuse Potential,"​ //Journal of Family Violence// 5, no. 1 (1990): 15-34.)) Women with higher levels of community involvement have lower feelings of psychological aggression and are less likely to abuse their child.((Bomi Kim, and Kathryn Maguire-Jack,​ “Community Interaction and Child Maltreatment,​” //Child Abuse & Neglect// 41, (2015): 146)) Without this support, they often seek care and comfort from their children, treating these children as if they were older than they really are. When children fail to provide this support, the mother can become impatient, angry, and sometimes abusive, even when the child is only a crying infant. Others find any social stimulation from their babies (whether smiling or crying) to be much more irritating than normal mothers do.((Ann M. Frodi and Michael E. Lamb, "Child Abusers'​ Responses to Infant Smiles and Cries,"​ //Child Development//​ 51, (1980): 238-241.)) ​Their abuse in turn adds to their anxiety and feelings of helplessness.((Philip G. Ney, "​Relationship Between Induced Abortion and Child Abuse and Neglect: Four Studies,"​ //Pre- and Perinatal Psychology Journal// 8, no. 1 (1993): 43-63.)) ​If the woman is a second-generation or later generation ​[[effects_of_out-of-wedlock_births_on_children|out-of-wedlock]] mother, or if she is a teenager, she is less likely to know what the appropriate expectations of a young child should be.
  
-Child-abusing mothers tend to have a distorted view of their children. Not surprisingly,​ they judge them more negatively than do outsiders and tend to ignore their good points, focusing only on transgressions. Typically, they often see their children'​s transgressions as more serious than they actually are. The good in their children they ascribe to circumstances,​ but the bad they ascribe to their character. They tell their children what not to do rather than what to do, and they use force and physical punishment much more frequently than do most other parents.+Child-abusing mothers tend to have a distorted view of their children. Not surprisingly,​ they judge them more negatively than do outsiders and tend to ignore their good points, focusing only on transgressions. Typically, they often see their children'​s transgressions as more serious than they actually are. The good in their children they ascribe to circumstances,​ but the bad they ascribe to their character. They tell their children what not to do rather than what to do, and they use force and physical punishment much more frequently than do most other parents.((B. L. Yegidis, "​Family Violence: Contemporary Research Findings and Practice Issues,"​ //Community Mental Health Journal// 28, no. 6 (1992): 519-530.))
    
-Child-abusing women also lack self-esteem and strength of will (termed "poor ego strength"​ by psychologists). They are more likely to be guided by their environment than by their own intentions (referred to as "​greater external locus of control"​). They are more depressed, feel rejecting of their children more often, withdraw from them often, use anger to control them, and in general show less affection toward them.  The child rejected by the mother frequently gets the most abuse. ​+Child-abusing women also lack self-esteem and strength of will (termed "poor ego strength"​ by psychologists). They are more likely to be guided by their environment than by their own intentions (referred to as "​greater external locus of control"​). They are more depressed, feel rejecting of their children more often, withdraw from them often, use anger to control them, andin generalshow less affection toward them.((B. Carlson, "​Causes and Maintenance of Domestic Violence: An Ecological Analysis,"​ //Social Service Review// 58, no. 4 (1984): 569-587.)) ​The child rejected by the mother frequently gets the most abuse. ​ 
 + 
 +Child-abusing women often had poor quality relationships with their own mothers and experienced mother-daughter physical abuse as a child. Additionally,​ women who had been with partners for a short amount of time were more likely to physically abuse their children.((Joel S. Milner, Kevin R. Robertson, and Debbie L. Rogers, “Childhood History of Abuse and Adult Children Abuse Potential,​” //Journal of Family Violence// 5, no. 1 (1990): 15-34. ))  ​
  
-The abusing mother is more likely to function at a lower intellectual level--with less ability to reason and understand her children and with fewer appropriate ways to handle them--than the nurturing mother. ​ John Bowlby of London'​s Tavistock Institute, one of the world'​s leading experts on the mother-infant relationship,​ concluded in a 1986 article that the absence of an early infant attachment between mother and daughter increases the likelihood that the daughter, as an adult, will abuse her own children. ​+The abusing mother is more likely to function at a lower intellectual level--with less ability to reason and understand her children and with fewer appropriate ways to handle them--than the nurturing mother.((Joel S. Milner, Kevin R. Robertson, and Debbie L. Rogers, "​Childhood History of Abuse and Adult Child Abuse Potential,"​ //Journal of Family Violence// 5, no. 1 (1990): 15-34.)) ​John Bowlby of London'​s Tavistock Institute, one of the world'​s leading experts on the mother-infant relationship,​ concluded in a 1986 article that the absence of an early infant attachment between mother and daughter increases the likelihood that the daughter, as an adult, will abuse her own children.((J. Bowlby, "​Violence in the Family as a Disorder of the Attachment and Caregiving Systems,"​ //American Journal of Psychoanalysis//​ 44, no. 1 (1984): 9-27.))
  
 ====2.3 Intergenerational Abuse==== ====2.3 Intergenerational Abuse====
  
-The most likely causes of child abuse by a mother, in fact, can be traced to the violence and substance abuse present in the mother'​s childhood, followed by the stress and discord in her current household. This is capped by her own victimization, ​ and leads to increased illness and a hypersensitivity to the annoyances that children cause. ​ In the period between her early experience with abusing parents and her later experiences with an abusing "​mate,"​ the future abusing mother frequently becomes more aggressive and deviant, developing a hostile and rebellious way of acting. She will associate more with men of similar hostility and eventually will "​marry"​ them, becoming an abused spouse herself. ​+The most likely causes of child abuse by a mother, in fact, can be traced to the violence and substance abuse present in the mother'​s childhood, followed by the stress and discord in her current household. ​A woman with a history of child abuse, and who lived in a violent community and had lower authoritarian parenting styles has a more serious risk for [[demographics_of_child_abuse|intergenerational transmission]] of child abuse.((Kristin Valentino, Amy K. Nuttall, Michelle Comas, John G. Borkowski, and Carol E. Akai, “Intergenerational Continuity of Child Abuse Among Adolescent Mothers: Authoritarian Parenting, Community Violence, and Race,” //Child Maltreatment//​ 17, no 2 (2012). )) This is capped by her own victimization,​((Suzanne Salzinger, Richard S. Feldman, Muriel Hammer, and Margaret Rosario, “Constellation of Family Violence and Their Differential Effects on Children’s Behavioral Disturbance,"​ //Child and Family Behavior Therapy// 14, no. 4 (1993): 23-41.)) ​and leads to increased illness and a hypersensitivity to the annoyances that children cause.((Joel S. Milner, Kevin R. Robertson, and Debbie L. Rogers, “Childhood History of Abuse and Adult Children Abuse Potential,​” //Journal of Family Violence// 5, no. 1 (1990): 15-34.)) ​In the period between her early experience with abusing parents and her later experiences with an abusing "​mate,"​ the future abusing mother frequently becomes more aggressive and deviant, developing a hostile and rebellious way of acting. She will associate more with men of similar hostility and eventually will "​marry"​ them, becoming an abused spouse herself.((Ronald L. Simons, Christine Johnson, Jay Beaman, et al., "​Explaining Women'​s Double Jeopardy: Factors That Mediate the Association Between Harsh Treatment as a Child and Violence by a Husband,"​ //Journal of Marriage and the Family// 55, no. 3 (1993): 713-723. ))
  
-Considering this type of family background, it is no wonder that abusing ​families ​ and mothers  ​often are the most isolatedIncreasinglythis isolation is most evident ​in the poorest neighborhoods ​in the United StatesAccording ​to the NIS-3 surveythese communities have the highest incidence ​of serious abuse.+Children are at risk of being abused if they are in families ​in which they see abuse. Thus, child abuse often is linked closely to abuse of the motherSignificantly, in one study, 90 percent of women residing ​in shelters for battered women and children said their children were in the same room or the next room while they were being abused.((Honore M. Hughes, "​Impact of Spouse Abuse on Children of Battered Women,"​ //Violence Update// 2, no. 12 (1992).)) This is telling because abused mothers were eight times more likely ​to hurt their children when they were being battered than when they were safe from their violent partners.((Jann Jackson//​Intervention with Children Who Have Witnessed Abuse//, (House ​of Ruth, Baltimore, MD).))
  
-Children are at risk of being abused if they are in families ​in which they see abuseThuschild abuse often is linked closely to abuse of the motherSignificantly, in one study90 percent ​of women residing ​in shelters for battered women and children said their children were in the same room or the next room while they were being abused This is telling because abused mothers were eight times more likely ​to hurt their children when they were being battered than when they were safe from their violent partners+Considering this type of family background, it is no wonder that abusing ​families((Bonnie LYegidis“Family Violence: Contemporary Research Findings and Practice Issues,” //Community Mental Health Journal// 28, no6 (1992): 519-530. )) and mothers((J. Bowlby"​Violence ​in the Family as a Disorder of the Attachment and Caregiving Systems," //American Journal ​of Psychoanalysis//​ 44, no.1 (1984): 9-27.)) often are the most isolated. Increasingly,​ this isolation is most evident ​in the poorest neighborhoods ​in the United StatesAccording ​to the NIS-3 survey, these [[effect_of_community_environment_on_child_abuse|communities]] have the highest incidence of serious abuse.((Sedlak, Mettenburg, Basena, Petta, McPherson, Greene, and Li., //Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect//, 147))
  
-Tragically, changes in community moral norms over the past five decades are reflected in the profile of the child-killing mother. As compared with her counterpart 50 years ago, the mother who kills her children today is younger, has more children, and exhibits less of a conscience. ​ In addition, many of her children are born out of wedlock. The next generation of child abusers is being formed in this environmentmany will never know that children can be treated differently.+Tragically, changes in community moral norms over the past five decades are reflected in the profile of the [[effects_of_maternal_attachment_on_crime_rates|child-killing mother]]. As compared with her counterpart 50 years ago, the mother who kills her children today is younger, has more children, and exhibits less of a conscience.((R. Weisheit, "When Mothers Kill Their Children,"​ //The Social Science Journal// 23, no. 4 (1986): 439-448. 
 +\\ 
 +\\ 
 +\\ 
 +This entry draws heavily from [[http://​thf_media.s3.amazonaws.com/​1997/​pdf/​bg1115.pdf|The Child Abuse Crisis: The Disintegration of Marriage, Family, and the American Community]].)) ​In addition, many of her children are born out of wedlock. The next generation of child abusers is being formed in this environment, and many will never know that children can be treated differently.