Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
state_of_the_family_in_alabama [2015/10/23 08:08]
marri
state_of_the_family_in_alabama [2017/06/08 08:03] (current)
marri
Line 7: Line 7:
 =====1. Index of Belonging===== =====1. Index of Belonging=====
  
-Alabama has a Family Belonging Index of 38.4 percent. In other words, 38.4 percent of Alabama teenagers aged 15 to 17 have lived with their always-married parents since their birth, whereas 61.6 percent of these adolescents were raised in a non-intact family. Alabama ranks 45th on the [[state_of_the_family_across_the_states|state ranking]] of the Index of Belonging and Rejection.((This entry draws heavily from original research found in [[http://downloads.frc.org/EF/EF12A45.pdf|Index of Family Belonging and Rejection: State by State (2011)]], [[http://downloads.frc.org/EF/EF12G39.pdf|Family Intactness: ​ Influence on Major State Social Policy Outcomes]], and [[http://​marri.us/​index-2013/states|Family Intactness and Public Policy Outcomes by State]].)) ​+Alabama has a Family Belonging Index of 38.4 percent. In other words, 38.4 percent of Alabama teenagers aged 15 to 17 have lived with their always-married parents since their birth, whereas 61.6 percent of these adolescents were raised in a non-intact family. Alabama ranks 45th on the [[state_of_the_family_across_the_states|state ranking]] of the Index of Belonging and Rejection.((This entry draws heavily from original research found in [[http://marri.us/research/​research-papers/​index-of-belonging-and-rejection-state-by-state/|Index of Family Belonging and Rejection: State by State (2011)]], [[http://marri.us/research/​research-papers/​family-intactness-influence-on-major-state-social-policy-outcomes/|Family Intactness: ​ Influence on Major State Social Policy Outcomes]], and [[http://​marri.us/​family-demographics/​family-intactness-and-public-policy-outcomes-by-state/|Family Intactness and Public Policy Outcomes by State]].)) ​
  
  {{ :​alabama_state_ranking.png?​direct&​600 |Alabama State Ranking}}  {{ :​alabama_state_ranking.png?​direct&​600 |Alabama State Ranking}}
Line 42: Line 42:
 {{ :​alabama_choropleth_homeowners.png?​direct&​500 |Alabama Homeowners}} {{ :​alabama_choropleth_homeowners.png?​direct&​500 |Alabama Homeowners}}
 ====3.7 Poverty==== ====3.7 Poverty====
-//See [[effects_of_family_structure_on_poverty|Effects of Family Structure on Poverty]]//+//See [[effects_of_family_structure_on_poverty|Alabama ​Effects of Family Structure on Poverty]]//
 \\ \\
 \\ **Fraction of the overall population below poverty** \\ **Fraction of the overall population below poverty**
Line 66: Line 66:
 {{ :​alabama_choropleth_female_ssi.png?​direct&​500 |Alabama Female Supplemental Security Income (SSI)}} {{ :​alabama_choropleth_female_ssi.png?​direct&​500 |Alabama Female Supplemental Security Income (SSI)}}
 ====3.9 Healthcare==== ====3.9 Healthcare====
-//See [[effects_of_family_structure_on_healthcare_coverage|Effects of Family Structure on Healthcare Coverage]]//​+//See [[effects_of_family_structure_on_healthcare_coverage|Alabama ​Effects of Family Structure on Healthcare Coverage]]//​
 \\ \\
 \\ **Fraction of 25- to 54-year-olds receiving public healthcare** \\ **Fraction of 25- to 54-year-olds receiving public healthcare**